Latour, B. (2009), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, MIT, Cambridge, MA and London. Michel Callon, né en 1945, est un sociologue et ingénieur français. Sylvander, B. In a later study, the same authors develop a further typology, disentangling the three dimensions of public engagement into communication, consultation and participation (Rowe and Frewer, 2005). While different seafood courses were being served to the tables, the two experts delivered their talks. 215-242. Cas du “label rouge” dans la filière Volailles, La Grande Transformation de l’agriculture – Lectures conventionalistes et régulationnistes, Changing perspectives on foresight and strategy: from foresight project management to the management of change in collective strategic elaboration processes, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Traditional Food Production and Rural Sustainable Development: A European Challenge, http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode, www.strength2food.eu/2016/08/23/how-is-local-fish-valued-by-the-people-of-sandefjord/, www.strength2food.eu/2017/09/21/fish-on-the-menu-but-is-it-local/, http://engage2020.eu/media/D3-2-Public-Engagement-Methods-and-Tools-3.pdf, www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/the-endless-controversy-over-organic-food-production-methods/253184/, It allows for in-depth understanding of issues among stakeholders, Direct citizen involvement with impartial/objective consensus reached on controversial issues, To create mutual understanding and facilitate creation of common ground towards proposed action Public conversation around complex and controversial issues, Flexible mechanism to suit local contexts and situations, To inform and consult, with need to reach consensus over a particular issue, Open and transparent process with potential good public outreach, To discuss on selected topic to assess opinions and attitudes, Facilitation is essential to ensure that all participants are able to contribute, Third generation deliberative process (3GDP), To involve citizens or stakeholders in participatory democratic hearings or policy input sessions, Potentially highly transparent for participants as it unfolds, and to the general public through reports, Potential for developing perspectives that are not obvious prior to the event, The purpose is to have a dialogue aiming at constructing a common project to improve the local community on a defined “controversy”. Consumers indicated how such consumption patterns mainly reflect the limited seafood availability from supermarkets and local fishmongers, exacerbating the confusion over what is local and in season. (2009), the existence of controversies contribute in enriching democracy. 18, pp. How can we adopt and benefit from HF 2.0. in a real context? CALLON PETROLEUM..... | Aktienforum | Aktien Forum | Diskussionsboard | Community von boerse-online.de. Furthermore, HF 2.0. should aim at engaging different local stakeholders and laypersons within the supply chain, to foster dialogue and disseminate about the project, as well as collect useful data to inform and potentially drive local pilot action initiatives. While creating a dynamic and interactive meeting place, HF 2.0. brings together the different worlds, via a web of local “actants,” aimed at a collective co-construction process of knowledge around given controversies in a predefined LAFS. What Latour calls “participants” and “ingredients” including dimensions we do not know or imagine (Latour, 2004). The conventionalization of organic stock farming: knowledge lock-in in the agrifood chain, Conclusions: towards a third generation of deliberative processes, Consumers and Nanotechnology: Deliberative Processes and Methodologies, Third-generation deliberative processes: from consumer research to participatory democracy, Conventions de qualité, concurrence et coopération. 2, pp. Brunori, G., Galli, F., Barjolle, D., et al. The full terms of this licence may be seen at http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/legalcode. You can join in the discussion by joining the community or logging in here.You can also find out more about Emerald Engage. Marres, N. and Lezaun, J. The event consisted in a “fish supper conversation,” whereby participants were invited to a three-course seafood themed meal, showcasing the cooking skills acquired by young trainees as part of the FLAG program. In the context of its experimental application, it is important to reflect on the effectiveness of the public engagement mechanism and conduct a post-evaluation regarding the structure and usefulness of the HF 2.0. Barham, E. and Sylvander, B. In other words, HF 2.0. build on several, but complementary, research pillars that are reflected in the methodological procedure developed as an experiment. Post# 29764030. still holding this stock . 4, pp. Eventually, the authors would also like to thank both reviewers for their valuable comments. The research team decided to adjust the structure of the HF 2.0. to improve the dialogue and better include the local actors. Moreover, both panelists and audience pointed out that Sandefjord area represents a good example for preserving the local food culture associated with fish, and argued that the chefs from the Sandefjord area have significantly contributed to promote the local seafood culture. Moreover, it is clear that HFs 2.0. can provide an innovative tool for collecting data and building knowledge on local issues. 30 No. Our intellectual debt to Michel Callon is immense and protean – and this book is here to remind us of that. An HF 2.0. approach offers to map human resources within a local community to address specific controversies and identify the mechanisms and drivers that can stimulate innovations and co-construct knowledge together. According to the constructivist approach within social sciences, controversies are emerging when scientific uncertainties meet social practices (such as everyday life, the food market or a new technological device), and can be defined as a process, or the process through which (scientific) knowledge is created[4]. However, there is sometimes a long way from plan to action. A local Social Enterprise partner of the S2Fcollaborative pilot action: www.foodnation.org/. Transparency is also supported by filming and audio-recording the discussions. Vorträge und Poster der Tagung stehen Ihnen noch bis zum 30.11.2020 on-demand zur Verfügung. This session, which lasted about three hours, concluded with a concrete proposition to arrange a crab festival on the docks to promote local seafood. Expert one stimulated the panelists with thoughts about the cultural power of fish which does not only represent a valuable source of income for fishermen, but also a social and cultural identity and usual food product for local people. The Involve Foundation, London, available at: Devising hybrid forums: technical democracy in a dangerous world, Structure des Controverses dans les Procédures Dialogiques: Cas de la Mise en Place d’un Forum Hybride en Norvège, Hybrid forum or network? The social and political construction of an international ‘technical consultation’: male circumcision and HIV prevention, Introducing and practicing PDO and PGI in Norway, Air to Air Heat Pumps in Norwegian Households: Technological and Market Development, Media Analysis and the Use of Practice Theory to Study Consumption, Scientific expertise in public arenas: lessons from the French experience, Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds, Why has critique run out of steam? The table also includes the third generation Deliberative Process (3GDP), a type of public participation method which provides a combination of classical bottom-up deliberative processes with stakeholder or citizen/consumer involvement through hearing systems (Strandbakken and Borch, 2015), which played a central role in the development of HF 2.0. (Eds), The Consumer in Society, Abstrakt forlag AS, Oslo, pp. Finding a valid and locally anchored controversy is at the heart of HF 2.0. In contrast with other conventional public engagement methods, such as citizen juries, consensus conferences, focus groups or deliberative processes, hybrid forums entail a more dynamic and democratic mechanism to reflect and act together, with the aim of constructing a common project around a defined challenge (Callon et al., 2001, 2009). Regarding the UK experiments, two key limitations were noted in the first HF 2.0. 3, pp. Between three and six participants were sitting at each table, including a Newcastle University researcher, who could further encourage participation if necessary and simply probe participants with some key questions. Nevertheless, Farías (2016) provides an excellent overview of these methods, and their role as participatory devices, organized in a Chilean city in 2010 (based on Callon et al.’s, 2001 book). Second, despite the democratic framework and the explanation of what HF 2.0. are and seek to achieve, it was not always possible to transcend and go beyond private interests, as each local actor had some private interests to protect and pursue. The social and political construction of an international ‘technical consultation’: male circumcision and HIV prevention”, Global Public Health, Vol. Rowe, G. and Frewer, L.J. Kim, I. and Arnhold, S. (2018), “Mapping environmental land use conflict potentials and ecosystem services in agricultural watersheds”, Science of The Total Environment, Vol. The discussions in both part one and part two were particularly stimulating and rich in content. Michel Callon, developer (with Bruno Latour and others) of Actor Network Theory, is Professor at the École des mines de Paris and a Researcher at the Centre de Sociologie de l'innovation there. Heidenstrøm, N.V. and Strandbakken, P. (2012), Air to Air Heat Pumps in Norwegian Households: Technological and Market Development, Media Analysis and the Use of Practice Theory to Study Consumption, Statens institutt for forbruksforskning, Oslo. This provided us with an opportunity to put into practice an experimental public engagement method, which we will refer to as Hybrid Forum 2.0. To a large extent, research on Localized Agro-Food Systems (LAFS)[1] offers an extensive debate field, whereby specific economic, social and environmental aspects of sustainability, and their trade-offs, are typically challenged by experts and relevant actors – i.e., from a general perspective (Sanz-Cañada, 2016), in relation to the local vs global sustainability of food (Brunori et al., 2016), or the environmental land use and watersheds management (Kim and Arnhold, 2018). Réviron, S. and Chappuis, J.-M. (2011), “Geographical indications: collective organization and management”, in Barham, E. and Sylvander, B. V60 Recharge Plug-in Hybrid. Fumel, M. (2016), Structure des Controverses dans les Procédures Dialogiques: Cas de la Mise en Place d’un Forum Hybride en Norvège, ISTHIA – University of Toulouse, Toulouse, p. 169. Controversies and confrontations are thus central elements to all public engagement methods, provided they can be used in a dynamic and positive way to reach a mutual discovery and comprehension. They are advised that the purpose of the forum is not to defend a personal agenda but to understand, preserve and improve the collective interests, to create a better local environment. Marion Nestle Feb 21, 2012 (Nestle, 2012). Experts can argue over whether organics are slightly or substantially less productive, but they are clearly better for soil and the environment. Cas du “label rouge” dans la filière Volailles”, in Allaire, G. and Boyer, R. (Eds), La Grande Transformation de l’agriculture – Lectures conventionalistes et régulationnistes, INRA Economica, Paris, pp. Gerd1 Gestern, 09:33 Hat eine Antwort im Thema Tiger Stripe verfasst. In the context of LAFS, various studies underline the importance of controversies, interactivity and dialogue in the construction, and in the constant adaptation, of LAFS (Stassart and Jamar, 2008; Barham and Sylvander, 2011; Mariani, 2018; Hegnes, 2012; Allaire et al., 2011). 3 Beiträge. The chapter is “Hashtag as hybrid forum: the case of #agchatoz” , and it builds directly on work I presented in Amsterdam last year and blogged about here. In other words, hybrid forums aim at “democratizing democracy” (Callon et al., 2009, p. 11) by using effective collective discussion as an active tool to develop a fair and better democratic world. Hyundai IONIQ Elektro. This HF 2.0. was held at a local restaurant in Newcastle upon Tyne, used as demonstration venue for Food Nation’s cookery courses and pilot activities. Wie können wir Ihnen heute helfen? Ich erinnere nur daran, dass in heutigen wissenschaftlichen Kontroversen das vorgezeichnet ist, was Arie Rip und Michel Callon "hybride Foren" genannt haben. (2004), “Why has critique run out of steam? Instead, controversies and confrontations are essential: “Hybrid forum are the cubicles in which existing facts and values are mixed in order to be recomposed and reconfigured” (Callon et al., 2009, p. 233). This chapter imports Michel Callon’s model of the ‘hybrid forum’ (Callon et al, 2009, p. 18) into social media research, arguing that certain kinds of hashtag publics can be mapped onto this model. (Eds), Labels of Origin for Food: Local Development, Global Recognition, CABI, Wallingford, Oxfordshire and Cambridge, pp. There are a number of different approaches to participatory democracy currently in use in Europe and in the USA since the last 15 years. The debate with panelists highlighted a number of demand-side barriers to local fish supply chains: e.g., low consumer interest and poor sense of adventure in buying/cooking different types of fish; unawareness of local and seasonal seafood species; apathy regarding provenance and traceability of seafood, with some exceptions in the high-end consumer market; mixed consumer perceptions regarding the price and value of seafood. Fumel M. (2016) Structure des controverses dans les procédures dialogiques: cas de la mise en place d’un forum hybride en Norvège. Engage 2020 (2014), “D3.2 public engagement methods and tools”, in Andersson, E., Bussu, S. and Davis, H. (Eds), Engage 2020 Tools and Instruments for a Better Societal Engagement in ‘Horizon 2020’, The Involve Foundation, London, available at: http://engage2020.eu/media/D3-2-Public-Engagement-Methods-and-Tools-3.pdf. 10 No. 2, pp. Abelson, J., Forest, P.G., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E. and Gauvin, F.-P. (2003), “Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes”, Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 239-251. Hier geht es zur virtuellen Veranstaltung (Anmeldung ist geschlossen): HDS.Forum Digital Virtual Venue. There are no offers available at the current time. Reply. Downloadable (with restrictions)! eCALL im Ioniq. We attempted to bring the traditionally separated fields of research on common sense and science together, under the hybrid forum umbrella of local representations and use of sustainable resources, to contribute to “the formation of networks of actors sharing a collective project” (Callon et al., 2009, p. 34). This includes an evaluation and comparison from other public engagement methods more commonly used. IONIQ - Allgemeine Themen. Allaire, G., Casabianca, F. and Thévenod-Mottet, E. (2011), “Geographical origin: a complex feature of agro-food products”, in Barham, E. and Sylvander, B. Throughout the duration of the five-year project, three HF 2.0. at three different seasons have been planned across seven European countries (France, Hungary, Italy, Norway, Poland, Serbia and the UK), in order to ensure some longitudinal continuity and interaction among local actors, to observe the impact of time and seasons – fundamental in LAFS – and explore the potential evolution of local controversies. 1, pp. Nach oben. View All Posts {{labelSign}} Favorites {{errorMessage}} coolfooldumbguy (668) User Actions . This chapter imports Michel Callon’s model of the ‘hybrid forum’ (Callon et al, 2009, p. 18) into social media research, arguing that certain kinds of hashtag publics can be mapped onto this model. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), aims at the democratization of expertise through the sustained collaboration among technical experts and issue publics on shared matters of concern. It is thus clear, how the aim of HF 2.0. is not to solve a problem, but to create a dynamic room where secluded research and research in the wild (Callon et al., 2009) can meet by creating new uncertainties or emphasizing a local controversy to be discussed by local actants. The participants (and not the researchers) lead the discussion and the content of the forum. As previously illustrated, developing HF 2.0. in the context of our S2F project aimed at providing a deeper understanding of current practices and controversies on the sustainability of LAFS, with the twofold objective of promoting citizen–stakeholder knowledge-exchange activity, while collecting multi-actor evidence-base for informing and, ultimately, shaping local development strategies or cultural adaptation on related issues. The public debate, in part two, brought together around 30 people, including representatives from the industry, civil society and general public. 251-290. Several topics were discussed throughout the dinner, the most important ones being the role of consumer perceptions in explaining consumption behavior, and the role of restaurants to promote a wider variety of seafood and lesser-known local species, with important implications for supporting strategic behavioral change. 25 No. By carefully describing the genealogy, organization and consequences of said forums, I reflect on three critical tensions underlying such collaborative processes. This is perhaps the most challenging aspect to reach in HF 2.0, and it is for this reason that the workshop of part one and the repetition of HF 2.0. during a long-term perspective are envisioned. 63-80. One of the aspects of his work that could constitute a subject of engagement, and that I would like to consider here, is the question of hybrid forums and of what participation could mean when science and techno-industrial objects and systems are implied. The date and place were decided together with the panelists, which were recruited two months in advance. Several uncertainties, linked to sustainability, pollution or obesity were critically discussed as collective issues. Markets are at the heart of consumption issues, but they often work unsustainably or unfairly, as their framework is not necessarily adapted to externalities or changes in the society. Vaz, T.D.N., Nijkamp, P. and Rastoin, J.-L. (2016), Traditional Food Production and Rural Sustainable Development: A European Challenge, Routledge, London and New York, NY. The ambition to improve the effectiveness of the food system to make it more sustainable and fairer is at the heart of our S2F research project. Although this may sound quite idealist, it is worth keeping in mind that hybrid forums are defined as spaces where controversies not only take place but also evolve: “they are powerful apparatuses for exploring and learning about possible worlds” (Callon et al., 2009, p. 28). Elektroautos und Plug-In Hybride. Vorläufige Daten (Herstellerangaben) Toyota Yaris 1.5 Hybrid; Motor/Antrieb. From a more pragmatic perspective, we discuss their effectiveness and limitations in the co-construction of knowledge based on experimental applications from Norway and the UK, in addressing controversies on local and sustainable seafood. Presented by Callon and his colleagues (2001) as a democratic and dynamic way to think and act together, hybrid forums can be described as public debates with the aim of constructing a common project around a defined challenge. Doubleday, R. (2004), “Institutionalising non-governmental organisation dialogue at Unilever: framing the public as ‘consumer-citizens’”, Science and Public Policy, Vol. HDS.Forum Digital am 12. Bisher hatte Toyota im Kleinwagensegment kaum Hybrid-Konkurrenz zu fürchten. As developed in this special issue, a LAFS “is a form of production of local identity-based foods explicitly grounded in specific territorial dynamics of agriculture, food and consumption networks” (Sanz-Cañada, 2016, p. 1). By the same token, local adaptation and transformation of the common methodological protocol could take place, to improve and better adapt to the field and scope of the event. Part one consisted of three academic researchers from Newcastle University, three representatives from Food Nation (the two directors and one community engagement coordinator) and five invited panelists: the program officer for the Fisheries Local Action Group (FLAG); the managing director of a Seafood Company in North Shields; the Seafood Company manager from a nearby coastal town, also founder of a fish box scheme initiative; the Head Chef from a local restaurant; one passionate fish consumer. Nevertheless, Farías (2016) provides an excellent overview of these methods, and their role as participatory devices, organized in a Chilean city in 2010 (based on Callon et al.’s, 2001 book). and Rochel de Camargo, K. (2015), “Hybrid forum or network? Part one consists of a preparatory workshop which aims at reaching a common level of knowledge, accrued via shared information on the subject, brief outline of the HF 2.0. structure, and awareness about each other’s ideas and perspectives. Quote Follow. The choice of panelists was agreed between the organizers and the date of the event was based on the panelists’ availability and communicated two months in advance. (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford. 489-509. Thomas Gestern, 13:41 Hat eine Antwort im Thema Tiger Stripe verfasst. Anyone may reproduce, distribute, translate and create derivative works of this article (for both commercial and non-commercial purposes), subject to full attribution to the original publication and authors. In this paper I study the managerial deployment of hybrid forums … Jan 2021, 20:32; andere Plug-In Hybride 125 3763 Letzter Beitrag Re: Passat GTE JokerGermany • Fr 4. Doch bald kommen der Honda Jazz und auch der Renault Clio als Vollhybride in den Handel. Hier mal ne Frage in den Raum geworfen, eCALL wird ja demnächst zur Pflicht. Nestle, M. (2012), “The endless controversy over organic food production methods”, available at: www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/02/the-endless-controversy-over-organic-food-production-methods/253184/ (accessed September 11, 2019). Compagnone, C. (2012), “Les appellations d’origine contrôlée comme ordre négocié”, Négociations,Vol. The HF 2.0. can be used as a communication tool (by invitation to discussion, debate and action), but it is mainly relevant to enhance sustainable practices as active research, by its investment of people, including consumer and citizen.